Formalism and Romanticism
Art
is an imitation. It is supposed to capture something significant about reality.
It represents particular things, or formal traits shared by multiple things. There
are two different theories of art, Formalism and Romanticism.
Formalism
states that the purpose of art is to represent the forms or ideas that
structure reality and guide behavior. Philosopher, Plato, claimed that that
aesthetic beauty is an intelligible form, and a universal archetype. Figurative
formalism and abstract formalism are the two forms of Formalism. Figurative Formalism
is represented indirectly in the guise of a particular thing, which is used as
an example of a symbol or form. Abstract Formalism represents the form
directly, abstracted from particular things. In both versions of Formalism, the
observer appreciates formal beauty through a special aesthetic sense or motion.
Rationalists believe that experiencing a purely rational type of pleasure comes
from art. They also believe that the proper attitude toward artwork is being “disinterested.”
In
Romanticism, the major function is to express non-rational emotions. And why,
you ask? One reason is because without a full range of experience, life is
incomplete, and we are out of touch with ourselves and nature. The second
reason is because these emotions can make us aware of a mysterious transcendent
reality, deeper than one we relate to. Romantics argue that rational beauty is
too narrow an aesthetic standard, and should be supplemented with sublime, or
overwhelm. The art theory that I think
is most plausible is Romanticism.
(A) Romanticism has more explanatory breadth than Formalism. It does
this because when you’re looking at a work of art you interpret it with
emotion. In romanticism, art work should be expressed through emotion. In
formalism, the proper attitude toward artwork is being disinterested.
(B) Romanticism has more explanatory depth than Formalism because of
the emotion romanticists put into art. The emotion really makes all the
difference. It makes the art seem more realistic and meaningful. Those are things people connect to when they
see the artwork. Formalism lacks emotion, therefore, people can’t have the same
deep connection to that kind of art.
(C) Formalism has more simplicity
or has fewer parts than Romanticism because with Formalism, art it is presented
without emotion, but in Romanticism, art has emotion and, therefore, everyone
will have a different interpretation when they look at it, whereas, with
formalism, they seem disinterested. There aren't as many interpretations that
it can be looked at. So, Formalism is definitely simpler than Romanticism.
(D) Romanticism has more conservatism
because it is more consistent with our common sense beliefs because it expresses
emotion and is realistic. Everyone will always have emotions and different
things will touch different people, no matter what. Formalism art is the art of
formal beauty that not very many people can connect with, like romanticism art
is.
1. Formalism and Romanticism are the most
plausible explanations for the theories of art.
2. Romanticism has more explanatory breadth, explanatory
depth, and conservatism, whereas, Formalism has more Simplicity.
3. Therefore, Romanticism
is the best explanation of the theory of art
I disagree with your reasoning for why romanticism has more explanatory breadth than formalism. You should have given a better reason or explained it in more detail by discussing emotions.
ReplyDelete"Romanticism has more explanatory depth than Formalism because of the emotion romanticists put into art." This sentence should not be the main reason to why romanticism has more explanatory depth because romanticists do not put the emotion that comes with art in to it, the person viewing the art causes that emotion; romanticists believe that non rational emotion should be included in the way which art should we judged.