There
are many forms of art, from music to paintings. Aesthetics is a branch of
philosophy that deals with the nature of art. It involves many theories that
examine the differences between art and non-art. Two of these theories are
Formalism and Romanticism. Formalism is the idea that the purpose of art is to
represent form and rationality. Romanticism states that art is not limited to
only the form and rationality of a piece, but that the function of art is to
express emotions.
In the aesthetics debate, I side with the Romanticists. I
believe that there is always some form of emotion triggered when viewing a work
of art. Formalists fail to address the emotions that people feel when they look at a piece of art; they simply concentrate on the beauty and technique of the piece.
Romanticism has more explanatory breadth than Formalism.
Romanticism looks at the emotional aspects of art rather than just the beauty
or form of the artwork. Formalists do not consider the emotional side of art. If you look at many pieces of art, some paintings don't look beautiful and some songs don't sound beautiful, but they still make the person experiencing them feel something.
Romanticism has more explanatory depth than Formalism. Romanticism goes into greater depth than Formalism does. Romanticism is not limited to the Formalist view, by adding their belief in emotions expressed by artwork. It explains more pieces of work than Formalism can. Formalism is vague by just claiming that art is only judged by beauty because life itself is based on the emotions we feel towards something, not just the beauty of it. People are able to relate to any form of art, not just the pleasing, making Romanticism a lot more plausible than Formalism.
Romanticism has more explanatory depth than Formalism. Romanticism goes into greater depth than Formalism does. Romanticism is not limited to the Formalist view, by adding their belief in emotions expressed by artwork. It explains more pieces of work than Formalism can. Formalism is vague by just claiming that art is only judged by beauty because life itself is based on the emotions we feel towards something, not just the beauty of it. People are able to relate to any form of art, not just the pleasing, making Romanticism a lot more plausible than Formalism.
Formalism has more simplicity than Romanticism. It only
focuses on the form and technique of art. Romanticists also take emotion into
consideration. In Romanticism, artwork is viewed differently based on the
person, making it more complicated. Formalists only find one meaning in
artwork, based on the form of the piece.
Romanticism is a lot more common now than Formalism is. When
it comes to any form of art, people find a connection to it through their
emotions. People judge artwork based in how it makes them feel rather than how it's structured or formed. It is not solely judged on the beauty of it, but also how it has an affect on the person's emotions.
1. Romanticism and Formalism are the most plausible explanations when judging art.
2. Romanticism has more explanatory
breadth, explanatory depth, and conservatism, whereas, Formalism has more
simplicity.
3. Therefore, Romanticism is the best
explanation when judging art.
I agree with your statement about romanticism having more explanatory breadth than formalist, i think that having a connection with the art piece is very important therefore romanticism have more breadth than just the art it self.
ReplyDelete