The debate between rationalism and empiricism is that how
independently we are with knowledge. Rationalism think we have some of our
ideas but then most comes after more experience, when empiricism think all of the ideas originate from experience. I feel that rationalism is more agreeable because we learn from experiences
and most ideas come from past experience. An idea that the rationalism thought that we
had is prior knowledge. To think that
when we are born, we are born with some kind of knowledge of what is going on
in the world.
Explanatory breath: Rationalism has more of an explanatory breadth
than empiricism because most of our ideas come from experience. For example,
people do not just wake up one day and say I’m going to be a millionaire by
doing nothing, they have to face experience to gather new ideas from that
experience to create something bigger and better. You can great an idea from another idea but
that doesn’t come from your own experience. You can’t really take another
persons idea and turn it into yours.
Empiricism can’t really explain better than rationalism, because
empiricism is basically our imagination, we jut think of things, but we don’t
really experience them.
Explanatory Depth
: Empiricism has more depth that
rationalism, of where and how experience is learned. Rationalism states that you are born with
knowledge with some ideas innate. For
example when you were a child , you had
don’t now anything or know that anything is bad , so when you do something,
you can process what just happened, to now not to do it again.
Simplicity :
Rationalism provides more simplicity than empiricism, because rationalism
believes that when we are born we have some knowledge, but how do they know
that even born child has knowledge. But
empiricism believes everything is learned from experience, which in some cases
it is but in others we just now because it is common sense. When we are born we save memory that are
innate.
Conservatism :
Empiricism is more consistent with out theory because we do learn from
experience. For example Steve Job was denied multiplied times before making Mac
, michael Jordan was also denied; they learned from their mistakes to make a
new ideas come true. It would have never happened, if their past experience
didn’t make them better thinkers.
Rationalism and Empiricism are most plausible explanation of
where our ideas come from.
Rationalism has much
more explanatory depth and simplicity , wheares Empiricism
has more explanatory
depth.
Therefore, Rationalism is the best explanation of where our ideas come from.
I agree with you that Empiricism has more explanatory depth, but I disagree that it has less breadth and simplicity. In terms of explanatory breadth, empiricists say that our ideas come from experience more than rationalism does. You explained more about experience than you did instinct, meaning that you were agreeing with empiricism instead of rationalism. Also, i think that empiricism is less complex because it is easier to explain.
ReplyDelete